Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Christians, Wake Up!

First, I know this post doesn’t apply to every Christian in America. I know many Christians who live out their lives differently. I also know many Christians who believe differently but choose not to speak out against their brothers and sisters who are in the wrong, choosing to offer grace, instead. I believe we are called to hold those who claim Christ in word accountable to their actions that do not reflect that allegiance. I’m not going to pull punches anymore, and I apologize in advance for hurting your sensibilities about your (presumed) right to a private life.

I believe that the American church has truly lost its way. It has chosen to absorb and incorporate political stances and views into its morality, rather than the opposite, effectively pushing Jesus out of the picture, except as a cute, cuddly little baby who is gushed over once a year and who makes us feel warm and fuzzy inside. It no longer stands for anything radical, and too often it wraps itself in the American flag because church members “fought and died for our freedom.” We Christians have warped the concept of separation of church and state, I believe, into something never intended and in order to keep our spiritual and earthly lives separate. It is time for Christians in America to wake up and stand up for God’s Kingdom first and remember where our true allegiance lies, or otherwise to walk away heavy-hearted, like the rich, young ruler, because we are asked too much.

The American church has fallen into a huge trap, a massive deception. It has come to believe that separation of church and state applies bidirectionally. It does not. Yet, we in the church have come to use it as a shield,  as a way to support distinctly un-Christian people and policies in the guise of “keeping the government out of our business.” I should know, because I was great at this. Being of a Libertarian (or Jeffersonian) mindset, I believe ultimately that fewer government restrictions on my life would allow me to live into my Christian identity more completely. And to an extent and in theory, that’s true. The reality of how that plays out is all too often different, though. Christians have come to support truly bs policies (such as the ban on refugees, for instance) because we have to “protect America first.” I believe that somewhere deep inside, American Christians have convinced themselves that if we protect America and make it strong economically, we will have more personal resources to direct towards helping the poor, needy, etc. While giving may go up in supposedly better economic times, that doesn't necessarily correlate with an improvement in health/life/care quality of the needy. At least, I’ve never seen it play out that way in my personal life. And because of this, I've had to change the way I think about my relationship to Christ and how that influences my stance on American policies/ideals. Beyond that, it's fairly irrelevant whether that holds true. It doesn't make it okay for me to support policies that actively hurt the poor and needy in hopes that it might end up helping somewhere down the road.

As a Christian, my desire to follow Christ should direct my policy decisions. Jesus never advocated for separation of church and state (that’s not what Matthew 22:21 is about). He showed us the way we should live and how our beliefs should be exemplified in every action we do and every choice we make. To me, that means I cannot stand up for a policy that excludes or rejects a person or a people for any reason (fear being the worst reason of all). This is concretely against what Jesus (and the Bible in general) teaches. There is NO valid argument a Christian can make to support a policy like this.

And to those who would hold up the mandate to be subject to our leaders because they’re God-appointed (Romans 13:1), that never meant to turn a blind eye to injustices done by our government just because they’re our government. Jesus’ life was full of examples of “breaking” human-instituted laws to follow God’s law. Furthermore, there are many examples in the Old Testament of God directing and allowing pagan rulers to destroy and capture Israel. This was always done so that God could restore and reconcile Israel to Himself again, and that is the sense in which I believe Paul’s statement should be understood. God may indeed allow (or appoint) people to power in order to cause (force, require) God’s people to rise up and take a stand and truly separate themselves from the powers and principalities of this world.

I also believe this means that we should support any policy to bring a higher level of care to all people in our country. Do I think Christians and individuals could more efficiently care for people than the government? Absolutely, but I haven’t seen that in action, ever. I do believe that it is our responsibility to take care of the poor and needy at whatever cost to ourselves, and that means supporting socialized healthcare, if it comes to it. After all, we have no right or claim to anything on this earth for ourselves. All of it belongs to God, and God has told us to treat others as ourselves, to give away all we have for the good of others. If we think we could care for people better than the government, then let’s reject government-provided healthcare with our own plan. But simply keeping things the way they are is not Christian.


Finally, I think it’s time we starting asking people we are friends, co-workers, or acquaintances with, “Are you a Christian?”, and we should expect and require an answer. Anyone who answers in the positive should be put to these hard questions and called to accountability. This above all else will offend our sensibilities. We have created a culture where “my Christian identity is between me and God.” But that’s complete bs. Our identity as followers of Christ is shown by our actions, by the fruit we bear. We should be excited to identify ourselves as Christians, and we should feel shame, not indignation, when someone calls us out for not acting out of our Christian identity. I’m ready to say to those who respond yes but whose words and actions reflect otherwise, “You may have salvation, but you don’t know Jesus. You’re not his follower as exemplified by your life.” I’m ready to cause strife amongst my supposed brothers and sisters, and to pit father against son, mother against daughter, etc. We need the true Church to rise up and speak out. Christians, wake up! Support policy and policy-makers whose choices actually reflect Christ’s values, not America’s. Separate yourselves from this American-Christian religion (which is idolatry and false), and come into Christ’s fold. There lies real freedom.

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

The Return

Wow. It's been quite a few years since I've even thought about this blog. I've been feeling that I need to have an outlet for my thoughts, lately, and (hopefully) a place to generate thoughtful discussion and growth. So, I'm going to try to come back and write every day/few days. We'll see how it goes, but your support will go a long way to motivating me, haha.

In a conversation with the pastor at my church yesterday, the concept of holiness came up. It was related to the idea of the Sabbath being a holy day, set apart, and the way Jesus sort of turned that on its head. As I thought about it, I believe there is indeed a progression from the idea of holiness being an external, set apart place/day/time we visit for cleansing and restoration of righteousness to something we can live into day by day and moment by moment. Everything we do can (should) be a holy act of worship to the glory of God.

I think I may begin to explore this progression as it moves through the Bible, from the Old Testament Law through the writings of the apostles. It would be interesting to explore the larger Talmud, but I shouldn't invest that much time/energy right now.

This won't be all the blog is about right now, and I don't want to define its goals to narrowly. At this point, I just want it to be an outlet for whatever's on my heart/mind and see how it develops.

So, welcome, enjoy the journey, and I look forward to your thoughts/responses.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Dell Smith's Page

I'm doing the Warrior Dash. Support me with your $ for St. Jude's. Only give if you think kids are okay and shouldn't die.

Click this link >>>>> Dell Smith's Page <<<<<<<

I like asymmetry.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Theos-Offroading: Finding Grace

i did not read don's post before i wrote mine, but it's definitely interesting how they intersect. check it out, and then read mine directly below this:

Theos-Offroading: Finding Grace: A mega church in Winston-Salem recently sent letters to families who attend worship but never volunteer, tithe or participate in sm...

prepare 1/22/12

this sunday is all about God's kingdom. we talk about it a lot, and so did Jesus (see Don's email). but what do we really understand about life in a kingdom? most, if not all, of us were born and have lived in the u.s. our whole lives. so, what exactly is the structure of a kingdom? the defining attribute is that it is organized as a monarchy. wikipedia gives this description for a monarchy: "A monarchy is a form of government in which the office of head of state is usually held until death or abdication, is most often hereditary, and usually accords official pre-eminence to members of the reigning dynasty" (full article, here).

so, God, being eternal and refusing to give up on his creation and abandon his throne, is king of all creation, and his power could be understood thus: "In an absolute monarchy, the monarch rules as an autocrat, with absolute power over the state and government—for example, the right to rule by decree, promulgate laws, and impose punishments. Absolute monarchies are not necessarily authoritarian; the enlightened absolutists of the Age of Enlightenment were monarchs who allowed various freedoms " (wikipedia).

i think this is a great way to understand God as king. we, being subjects in his kingdom, are bound to follow every one of this laws and decrees. failing that, God has the right to punish us in whatever way he desires. yet, through his great love and mercy, he has absolved every one of our sins by taking them on in Jesus Christ. to understand that is not to believe that because God chooses not to make us bear the weight of our punishment we can do whatever we want. our greatest command is to love God and to love each other, and when we love people, we strive to make them happy and let their will be imposed on us. by all rights, God could force this sort of obedience from us. he is king, after all. yet, he chooses to let us be free, to love him or not, to accept his will or our own. any earthly king who did this would surely have been loved above all others.

the anthem this week is a traditional spiritual, "ev'ry time i feel the spirit." it is about prayer, but it also reflects the idea of living in a hierarchical society. the slaves were not free. they had no choice but to follow their masters' commands or face the consequences. plantations were in this respect like mini-kingdoms. how different were the attitudes and actions of the slave owners from the king most of them professed to serve!

the other hymns reflect the majesty of God and his holy city, Zion, and then they challenge us as loyal and loving servants to fulfill the role Jesus gave to us: “Go into all the world and proclaim the good news to the whole creation" (Mark 16:15).

see you sunday!

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

prepare 1/15/12

well. i'm back. gonna try to make this a regular thing. eventually, i hope it will be. tell your friends!

so, as don begins a new sermon series on the Lord's Prayer, i thought it would be cool to do a series of songs with the choir that are either prayers themselves, or they are about praying. the church has such a diverse history, but prayer has remained important in all cultures/traditions. throughout the series, you'll get to hear songs that reflect the richness of that history, from spirituals to prayers from russia to famous prayers set to music.

this sunday, we go back in our own tradition to a favorite among churchgoers: "Sweet Hour of Prayer." written by William Walford, a blind preacher from england, presumably in the anglican church (out of which grew the methodist church). the words reflect the peace and joy that prayer provides, as well as the chance to leave the distractions of the world behind and come back to what really matters. i hope that the words of the song, as well as the musical setting, will move you to a place to hear don's important words about the wonderful prayer our savior gave us to ultimately communicate with him.

Sweet hour of prayer! sweet hour of prayer!
That calls me from a world of care,
And bids me at my Father’s throne
Make all my wants and wishes known.
In seasons of distress and grief,
My soul has often found relief
And oft escaped the tempter’s snare
By thy return, sweet hour of prayer!

Sweet hour of prayer! sweet hour of prayer!
The joys I feel, the bliss I share,
Of those whose anxious spirits burn
With strong desires for thy return!
With such I hasten to the place
Where God my Savior shows His face,
And gladly take my station there,
And wait for thee, sweet hour of prayer!

Sweet hour of prayer! sweet hour of prayer!
Thy wings shall my petition bear
To Him whose truth and faithfulness
Engage the waiting soul to bless.
And since He bids me seek His face,
Believe His Word and trust His grace,
I’ll cast on Him my every care,
And wait for thee, sweet hour of prayer!

Sweet hour of prayer! sweet hour of prayer!
May I thy consolation share,
Till, from Mount Pisgah’s lofty height,
I view my home and take my flight:
This robe of flesh I’ll drop and rise
To seize the everlasting prize;
And shout, while passing through the air,
“Farewell, farewell, sweet hour of prayer!”

the other songs this sunday reflect the idea of our god as heavenly father and deserving of our praise.